Veiled... but not exactly well-covered.� Eep.
After a long talk with Paradox tonight, I've realized that I have a real double-standard in my art.� I draw males way more than females.� Duh.� The reason for that is obvious:� Totally gay.
But when I do draw females, I never draw them like I draw the males.� My guys are almost all boytoys, sexy and svelte, no matter what they are doing.� They could be hunting or sleeping or whatever, and I'll draw them as hawt and near-nekkid as possible.
But the females, when they appear at all, are always gung-ho, warrior chicks.� They are modestly covered, tomboyish.� Strong.� Not toys. I try really hard not to to sexualize or objectify them.� You don't get Mayda looking sultry; you get her looking defiant, hungry, sleepy... but not sexy.
And that's not fair.� If the boys are going to be objects, then damnit, so can the girls.
And so here is a picture to try and balance out the double standard.� I have learned much tonight.� Not least of which is: women are really hard to draw.
